 |
|
The hoarding that reads "The Gold Museum is Changing"
does no more than indicate that something is going on behind
the walls of the place that has shown the country and the whole
world the wonders of Colombia's pre-Hispanic universe. It is
an invitation to stop and look, to see that a gigantic building
covered in grey marble has rised up behind the traditional museum,
which won the National Architecture Prize after it opened in
1968. That is the image you get from outside: the vault has
grown! The compact building denotes that something of immense
value lies behind those facades. And this is true, in fact.
For it is the archaeological and anthropological heritage of
the nation.
And to help assimilate the idea, the respective alterations:
new building, a new way of telling the story, new technological
resources, new services. In short, a new museum. The latest
museographical techniques in hermetic showcases, optic fibre
lighting and invisible supports for objects, signs and bases,
but above all, in the concept of the rooms: a clear and open
setting, where it is the gold that takes centre stage.
To these formal innovations has been added a new account of
the history of metallurgy, one which views it as a living cycle:
gold is extracted, worked, used, symbolised, and then offered
up so it can return to the earth. And to enable the images to
be studied in greater depth, there are pedagogical animations,
a place where knowledge can be explored, multidisciplinary cultural
activities, and a multimedia room connected to the museum's
technological "brain", so that visitors can investigate,
look around, and be tempted by somewhere they will feel they
have to visit again.
Because 50,000 gold, pottery, wood, stone and textile objects
make up the collection, and are the result of a need to preserve
objects that for centuries were plundered and acquired by various
public and private entities, and even given away and sold to
foreign governments, which today proudly display them in their
museums and collections. When the Banco de la República
realised what was going on, it finally set about acquiring them
and preserving them in 1939.
Yet although these artefacts were known to be valuable, it
was not clear then that they contained vital evidence of our
past. Today we do know this. It is easy with hindsight to criticise
our forefathers for their lack of foresight, but we should cast
our minds back to the early years of the 20th century, when
gold was still a synonym for jewel-treasure-wealth and the concepts
of preservation and museum were non-existent, as only then can
we begin to understand why it took until 1939 for the country
to set about protecting the remains of its past.
It nevertheless took a long time for this work to take shape.
The change of mentality was something totally intuitive. And
although the first legislation aimed at protecting the country's
heritage dates back to the 1920s, it is only comparatively recently
that it has been possible to talk of really protecting Colombia's
physical heritage, through things like campaigns in the media.
The fields of anthropology and archaeology were noticeable for
their total absence in the classroom. It was not until decades
later, during the 1940s, when scientists Gerardo Reichel-Dolmatoff,
Luis Duque Gómez and others who were fascinated by Colombia's
indigenous cultures settled in the country, that a more professional
approach began to come to the fore. Studies were carried out
of the objects in the collection, and trips were made to the
country's different archaeological regions. Then, a start was
made on applying theories about how the collection should be
classified, organised and made known. These theories were gradually
adapted to the times and the needs of the public.
Because ultimately a museum is a place which preserves and
studies the memory. A museum which from 2004, in the case of
the first stage, and from 2008 as far as the whole project is
concerned, will use the very latest technology to show how an
object that is hundreds of years old can feel so 'present'.
The contemporary Gold Museum allows the visitor to sense the
universe that surrounded the object, the man who made the object
and gave it a functional use, who gave it a ritual value, who
offered it up, and who returned it to the earth. A cycle which
precisely portrays the life that grew up behind each object.
A sensory experience which creates a need to journey to other
times, to feel, even if only for a moment, that you are part
of an unknown, moving space, to attach yourself to that past
skin of which so little now remains, in order to understand
the alliances and links that existed between nature and our
mythical ancestors.
| |
|
|
| |
Proyecto Arquitectónico
Samper Arquitectos Ltda.
Diseño Estructural
Hernán Sandoval Arteaga & Cia. Ltda.
Diseño del Aire
Acondicionado
Alvaro Tapias & Cia. Ltda.
Diseño Eléctrico
Fernando Acosta Yunda & Cia. Ltda.
Diseño de Automatización
EBC Ingeniería & Cia. Ltda.
Gerencia de Obra
Banco de la República
Interventoría
Estudios Técnicos S.A.
Construcción
Conconcreto S.A.
Construcción Área
de Transición
Cadena Fawcett S.A.
Pizano, Pradilla y Caro
Guión Científico
y Curaduría
Museo del Oro Banco de la República
Consultoría Estudios
Técnicos
Roberto Benavente/HB Design
Realización del
Proyecto Museográfico
Museo del Oro Banco de la República
Diseño e Implementación
Audio y Video Museográfico
Alberto Veloza
Diseño Gráfico
La Silueta
Diseño Señalización
Ana Vélez
Concepto Escenográfico
Sala de la Ofrenda
Mapa Teatro
Música Sala de la
Ofrenda
Sergio Mesa
Gerencia de Producción
Museográfica
Banco de la República
|
|
| |
|
|
|